Multi-tenant SaaS for the software development lifecycle

Plan the work. Govern every deployment.

Epics, sprints and boards on one side. On the other, a change-governance workflow that carries every release from development to production with committee authorization, install evidence and a full audit trail.

  • Tenant isolation on three layers
  • Append-only audit log
  • Spanish and English

11

Governed deployment phases

11

Work item types

3

Tenant isolation layers

2

Interface languages

Capabilities

Everything the delivery cycle needs, in one place

Planning, execution and governance share one data model, so a task, the sprint it belongs to and the release that ships it are never three disconnected tools telling three different stories.

Configurable work items

Epic, Feature, PBI and Task, plus Bug, Issue, Impediment and Support. States, transitions and required fields are defined per tenant, not fixed by us.

Boards and backlog

Drag a card and the workflow decides whether the move is legal. Illegal transitions are refused with a reason instead of silently accepted.

Sprints and capacity

Plan by real availability: team calendars, per-person capacity and burndown computed from the history, not from a manually updated field.

Reports that answer why

Flow bottlenecks, cumulative flow, on-time delivery graded from the actual transition history — so a report says what happened and where, not just how many.

Business Case and investment

Tie delivery to the business: owner area, cost centre, investment amount and the deployments that spent it, on the same record.

Roles with real boundaries

Atomic permissions, deny by default. The project manager governs the work; the tenant administrator governs the system — and neither can grant itself the other's authority.

Dynamic control

The process bends to your organization

Workflows, states and field rules live in configuration, not in our source code. Two tenants on the same platform can run genuinely different processes — and change them without waiting for a release.

  • Per-tenant state machines Add a state, reroute a transition, require a comment on the ones that matter. Each transition keeps a named reason derived from the pair it connects.
  • Field policies by state Decide which fields are required, editable or frozen in each state, so data quality is enforced at the moment of the change.
  • Configurable roles and plans Functional roles are editable templates, and each plan decides which modules a workspace can reach.

Any sector

Not built for one industry — built to take the shape of yours

Every organization that ships change needs the same three things: a way to track what is happening, one place where the information lives, and evidence of who approved what. What differs between industries is the process — and here the process is configuration, not our source code.

Banking and finance Change windows, segregation of duties and an auditable trail.
Health Controlled releases and evidence retained for review.
Government and public sector Formal authorization and traceability from request to release.
Retail and e-commerce Frequent releases without losing control of the calendar.
Manufacturing Plant systems where an unplanned stop is expensive.
Telecommunications Many teams and suppliers converging on one release.
Logistics and transport Operations that cannot pause while a change goes in.
Education and services Seasonal cycles with clear planning windows.

One place for the information

When the request, the work, the approval and the evidence live on separate tools, reconciling them becomes somebody's job. Here they are the same record, so there is nothing to reconcile.

A method, not a habit

A workflow the software enforces gives every team the same steps. It stops depending on who is on shift, and it survives the person who used to remember how it was done.

Answers when they are asked for

What shipped, when, who authorized it and what happened next — reconstructable from the record itself, whether the question comes from an auditor, a client or the board.

The sectors above are examples, not packaged templates: what adapts is the workflow, the states, the field rules and the roles, configured per workspace.

Change governance

Every release passes through the same gates

Not a status field someone remembers to update — a state machine. Each phase has an owner role and an exit requirement, and the transitions that matter demand a written reason before they are allowed.

  1. 1 New
  2. 2 Development
  3. 3 Code Review
  4. 4 Test
  5. 5 To Committee
  6. 6 Committee Authorized
  7. 7 Installed Pre
  8. 8 To Committee Prod
  9. 9 Committee Prod Authorized
  10. 10 Installed Prod
  11. 11 Done

A committee, not a checkbox

Production is authorized by a named approver holding the role — twice, once for Pre and again for Prod. The decision, the approver and the moment are all recorded.

Evidence, not assurances

Install evidence is attached to the phase it belongs to, so an auditor can reconstruct what shipped, when, and who signed it off.

Rollbacks open their own bug

A production rollback demands a mandatory reason and generates a severity-1 bug linked to the deployment. Failure is recorded, never quietly retried.

Where it fits

A tracker plans work. A pipeline ships code. Neither governs the change.

Most teams end up with both, plus a spreadsheet and an email thread holding the approvals. DevGov keeps the approval, the evidence and the work item on the same record.

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Native capabilities by category of tool
Capability Issue tracker CI/CD pipeline DevGov
Backlog, boards and sprints Native Outside its purpose Native
Automated build and deploy execution Outside its purpose Native Native
Change committee authorization by role Usually added on Usually added on Native
Pre and Production install evidence on the record Usually added on Usually added on Native
Rollback opens a linked severity-1 bug automatically Outside its purpose Outside its purpose Native
Per-tenant workflow and field policy configuration Usually added on Outside its purpose Native
Append-only audit log across work and releases Usually added on Usually added on Native

This compares what each category of tool does out of the box. Many products in the first two columns can cover the remaining rows through plugins, integrations or custom work — the difference is whether it arrives assembled and governed, or has to be built and maintained by you.

Isolated by subdomain

Each workspace answers on its own subdomain, and every query is scoped to its tenant at the repository layer — not by remembering to add a filter.

Append-only audit

State changes, phase transitions, permission changes and denied access are all recorded. The application never updates or deletes an audit row.

Hardened by default

Deny-by-default permissions, per-endpoint ownership checks, rate limiting on sensitive routes and a content policy that forbids inline script.

Installs on your phone

The workspace can be installed as an app on Android, iOS and desktop, with offline support and its own update channel.

About and legal

What the platform is, and the terms that govern using it

DevGov

A multi-tenant SaaS for the software development lifecycle — work items from Epic down to Task, plus a first-class Deployment module that governs every release through committee approval and install evidence.

11 Deployment phases
11 work item types
14 built-in roles
3 tenant-isolation layers

Our mission

Give every team a single, auditable source of truth for what's being built and what's being deployed — without forcing everyone onto the same rigid process.

Vision

A place where "who approved this?" and "what changed?" always have an immediate, trustworthy answer — for a team of ten or an organization running dozens of tenants side by side.

Reach

From the first backlog item to the last install in Production — one platform for planning, building, reviewing and shipping, instead of stitching several disconnected tools together.

What we value

Tenant isolation

Every query, every write, every file — scoped to your tenant at every layer, not just the login screen.

Traceability

Every state change, every deployment phase, every permission edit — appended to an audit trail nobody can quietly rewrite.

Adaptability

Work item states, roles, and workflows are configurable per tenant — the platform bends to your process, not the other way around.

Accountability

A committee decision, a permission grant, a role change — always made by one identifiable person, never anonymous and never automated.

Built to scale

Cursor-paginated lists and anti-N+1 query patterns throughout — a project with ten work items and one with ten thousand behave the same way.

No proprietary lock-in

Standard, well-understood building blocks — MySQL, JWT, bcrypt — instead of a proprietary black box only the platform operator can reason about.

What makes it different

A real change-governance workflow

The Deployment module takes a change through 9 phases — development, review, committee authorization, Pre and Prod install evidence — with rollback-triggered bugs generated automatically.

The full work-item hierarchy

Epic → Feature → PBI/User Story → Task, plus Bug, Issue, Impediment, PreRelease Defect, and Support — one backlog, not five disconnected trackers.

Roles that match how you actually govern

Tenant Admin governs the system; SCRUM/PM governs the work. Functional roles — PO, Tech Lead, QA, Release Manager, Committee Approver — are editable templates, not fixed labels.

An audit log that can't be edited

Append-only by design — no UPDATE, no DELETE, from inside the app. What happened, happened.

Bilingual from day one

Every screen — including this one — is available in Spanish and English, switchable at any time, not translated as an afterthought.

Security aligned with OWASP and NIST, from day one

Every change is reasoned through against the OWASP Top 10 before it ships, and the platform's own controls — access, encryption, audit logging — are built around NIST's guidance from the start, not added on afterward. See "Información Legal" → "3. Data security" for the specifics.

Built for

Delivery teams Plan
Change committees Approve
Audit and compliance Prove
Business and leadership Decide

One record serves all four: the team plans on it, the committee authorizes on it, the auditor reads it back, and the business sees what the investment bought — instead of four tools that have to be reconciled.

Bring your releases under the same roof as your work

Sign in to your workspace, or reach the administrator of your organization to have one opened for you.